DoctiPlus maintains the highest standards of medical accuracy, editorial integrity, and ethical publishing.
Our editorial policy ensures all health information meets rigorous clinical standards, is evidence-based, and serves the best interests of patients and healthcare professionals.
Every piece of content undergoes strict medical review by board-certified physicians and healthcare experts.
Evidence-BasedPeer ReviewedMedical Board CertifiedHON Code CompliantTransparency First
Medical Accuracy
All medical content is reviewed by board-certified physicians and subject matter experts. We cite peer-reviewed journals, clinical studies, and authoritative medical organizations.
Information is regularly updated to reflect current medical standards and emerging research.
Editorial Independence
Our editorial team operates independently from commercial interests. Medical content decisions are based solely on scientific evidence and clinical relevance,
not influenced by advertisers, sponsors, or financial considerations.
Source Standards
Primary sources: Peer-reviewed medical journals and clinical trials
Government health agencies (CDC, NIH, FDA, WHO)
Professional medical associations and societies
Board-certified specialists in relevant medical fields
Transparency & Disclosure
We clearly identify all authors, medical reviewers, and their credentials. Any potential conflicts of interest, funding sources, or commercial relationships
are transparently disclosed to maintain trust and credibility.
Our Editorial Standards Framework
DoctiPlus adheres to internationally recognized medical publishing standards and ethical guidelines.
E-A-T Compliance
Expertise, Authoritativeness, and Trustworthiness are fundamental to all our content. Medical experts with relevant credentials author and review all health information.
ICMJE Guidelines
We follow International Committee of Medical Journal Editors standards for authorship, conflicts of interest, and publication ethics in medical content.
HON Code Principles
Compliant with Health On the Net Foundation principles for reliable health information online, including authority, complementarity, and transparency.
Evidence Hierarchy
We prioritize systematic reviews, randomized controlled trials, and clinical guidelines over case reports or expert opinions when establishing medical facts.
Regular Updates
Medical content is reviewed annually or when significant new evidence emerges. Update dates and revision histories are clearly documented.
Plain Language
Complex medical information is presented in accessible language while maintaining scientific accuracy, helping patients make informed decisions.
Our Medical Review Process
1 Content authored by qualified medical writers or healthcare professionals with relevant expertise and credentials.
2 Fact-checking against primary sources including peer-reviewed journals, clinical guidelines, and authoritative medical databases.
3 Medical review by board-certified physicians specializing in the relevant medical field or condition.
4 Editorial review for clarity, accuracy, bias, and adherence to our style guidelines and ethical standards.
5 Final approval by our Chief Medical Officer before publication, with ongoing monitoring for accuracy and updates.
6 Post-publication monitoring for reader feedback, new research developments, and periodic comprehensive reviews.
Editorial Policy FAQ
We maintain a structured review schedule with annual content audits, immediate updates when breakthrough research emerges, and continuous monitoring of major medical journals and health organization announcements. Our medical advisory board alerts us to significant developments in their specialties.
All medical reviewers are board-certified physicians, licensed healthcare professionals, or PhD-level researchers in relevant fields. We require active practice or research experience, published work in peer-reviewed journals, and ongoing continuing medical education. Reviewer credentials are publicly available.
For controversial topics, we present the current scientific consensus while acknowledging areas of ongoing debate. We cite multiple authoritative sources, explain the strength of evidence, and clearly distinguish between established facts and evolving research areas.
No. Our editorial content is never influenced by commercial interests. While we may have advertising on our platform, it is clearly separated from editorial content and does not influence our medical information or treatment recommendations in any way.
We encourage feedback through our contact form, dedicated medical accuracy email, or direct communication with our editorial team. All reports are reviewed by our medical team within 48 hours, with corrections published promptly when warranted.
DoctiPlus content is for informational purposes and never replaces emergency medical care. We include clear disclaimers directing users to emergency services for urgent situations and emphasize the importance of consulting healthcare providers for personal medical decisions.
Editorial Team Contact
Questions about our editorial standards, suggestions for content improvement, or reports of medical inaccuracies? Our editorial team reviews all submissions promptly.
This editorial policy is reviewed annually and updated as needed to maintain the highest standards of medical publishing ethics.